Only 44.5. But kinda beefy. Fish was thick all the way around.

This one we thought may have had VHS due to its buggy eyes with sores around them. Pics were sent to the appropriate people in the DNR but they could not verify without a biological sample. It went away strong but I had never seen one with eyes like this.

"><url url="[Permission to view this media is denied]
"><link_text text="[Permission to view this media is denied] … tedty5.jpg">[Permission to view this media is denied]
” alt=”<url url="[Permission to view this media is denied]
"><link_text text="[Permission to view this media is denied] … tedty5.jpg">[Permission to view this media is denied]
” />

"><url url="[Permission to view this media is denied]
"><link_text text="[Permission to view this media is denied] … tedmg2.jpg">[Permission to view this media is denied]
” alt=”<url url="[Permission to view this media is denied]
"><link_text text="[Permission to view this media is denied] … tedmg2.jpg">[Permission to view this media is denied]
” />

Good eye, Kid. She did have a short nose but I don't think it had anything to do with the eyes. We may never know.