Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Min search length: 3 characters / Max search length: 84 characters
Forum Login
Lost password?
sp_TopicIcon
Sanford Fish Kill
Avatar
83 Posts
(Offline)
1
June 2, 2011 - 9:56 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

Hey guys two large musky have been caught and kept in the last week. A 51 inch and 56 inch Musky. Do people not care or are they not aware of what what a 56 inch fish means to a fishiery. Is their anything MMA does to raise awarness on musky lakes?

Avatar
549 Posts
(Offline)
2
June 2, 2011 - 10:32 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

You've got to be kidding me!! Makes me sick! A 56"er in an inland Michigan lake is so rare. I wonder if the length was a lie? Either way it's a sad story! People don't understand that once a fish is gone, it's gone for good! What a shame! Sorry for those dedicated Muskie anglers who consider Sanford their home waters. Sorry guys!! I feel for ya!!

Avatar
605 Posts
(Offline)
3
June 3, 2011 - 6:11 am
ToolsPrintQuote

"Burglar34" said:
Hey guys two large musky have been caught and kept in the last week. A 51 inch and 56 inch Musky. Do people not care or are they not aware of what what a 56 inch fish means to a fishiery. Is their anything MMA does to raise awarness on musky lakes?

Can you confirm this? or is it a I heard it from my brothers, sisters, uncles, husband kind of thing? Can you get your hands on pics?

Avatar
83 Posts
(Offline)
4
June 3, 2011 - 11:24 am
ToolsPrintQuote

I'll see if I can get pictures but info comes from Sanford Bait & Tackle and they have hard copy pictures.

Avatar
748 Posts
(Offline)
5
June 3, 2011 - 11:51 am
ToolsPrintQuote

56" would be unreal if that is a documented length. Sadly fish of that size are almost certainly going to be killed if not caught by a dedicated muskie guy. It sucks but its all completely legal and it is what it is.

Avatar
369 Posts
(Offline)
6
June 3, 2011 - 2:58 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

I'm betting that fish was not recently caught and was not 56 inches. I'll be that they are refering to the 52 incher that was speared this winter or at least I hope so.

Avatar
83 Posts
(Offline)
7
June 3, 2011 - 6:00 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

I'm still trying to get some pictures but the bait shop says the 50 inch fish was caught during the Northern pike tournament and the 56 inch fish just a few days later. Again does MMA have any programs to help build community awareness on musky lakes?

Avatar
1151 Posts
(Offline)
8
June 3, 2011 - 9:29 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

"Burglar34" said:
Again does MMA have any programs to help build community awareness on musky lakes?

Check around the MMA web site and you will find several ideas geared to public muskie education. Don't feel alone on trying to help Stanford Lake. Many other lakes have problems including Hamlin Lake with the locals killing muskies of any size, legal or not.

Avatar
369 Posts
(Offline)
9
June 6, 2011 - 10:32 am
ToolsPrintQuote

fish confirmed in an article by Steve Griffin in sunday's Midland Daily News. It was caught below the Sanford Dam in the River. The article includes some quotes from Jim Baker a highlight of which is refering to C&R as "recycling" fish. . Sorry guys but in my opinion, Baker is a tool.

Avatar
605 Posts
(Offline)
10
June 6, 2011 - 12:52 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

"Burglar34" said:
I'm still trying to get some pictures but the bait shop says the 50 inch fish was caught during the Northern pike tournament and the 56 inch fish just a few days later. Again does MMA have any programs to help build community awareness on musky lakes?

Again, check the website MMA does alot….BUT that doesn't mean you
can stop people from keeping a legal fish they catch just because we would let it go.

Avatar
35 Posts
(Offline)
11
June 6, 2011 - 5:57 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

"Scrappy" said:
fish confirmed in an article by Steve Griffin in sunday's Midland Daily News. It was caught below the Sanford Dam in the River. The article includes some quotes from Jim Baker a highlight of which is refering to C&R as "recycling" fish. . Sorry guys but in my opinion, Baker is a tool.

Jim has always been a fan of put and take fisheries. The DNR puts them in the anglers take them out. It is what keeps him in business.

Avatar
369 Posts
(Offline)
12
June 7, 2011 - 2:56 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

Dennis: It might help if Jim leared the difference between a walleye and a musky. [smilie=bangtard.gif]

Avatar
83 Posts
(Offline)
13
June 11, 2011 - 9:32 am
ToolsPrintQuote

Heres an article about the muskies that were caught.

<url url="[Permission to view this media is denied]
"><link_text text="[Permission to view this media is denied] … e9a1f.html">[Permission to view this media is denied]

Avatar
369 Posts
(Offline)
14
June 14, 2011 - 2:52 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

I have been e-mailing with Steve about this and we plan to spend a half a day fishing Sanford together in the next several weeks to discuss my desire that he do an article on the importance of catch and release and using the proper equipment to catch muskies. With any luck I will get him to do a story that talks bout how stocking has been inconsistent in Sanford and that if quality musky fishing is going to continue to be available in Midland Co. folks should consider catch and release and if a true monster is caught, consider a replica and let her swim. I'll let you all know how my efforts turn out on this.

How those two guys got those two fish landed on 8 lb test in the river below the dam is beyond me.

Forum Timezone: America/Detroit
All RSSShow Stats
Top Posters:
Steve S: 2712
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 111
Topics: 9245
Posts: 57511

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 0
Members: 16575
Moderators: 0
Admins: 2

Most Users Ever Online
368
Currently Online
Guest(s)
14
Currently Browsing this Page

1 Guest(s)