Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Min search length: 3 characters / Max search length: 84 characters
Forum Login
Lost password?
sp_TopicIcon
Lake St. Clair yields two phenomenal fish
Avatar
1151 Posts
(Offline)
1
August 19, 2007 - 9:19 am
ToolsPrintQuote

Go to the link to see the photo of the 41 pounds, 14 ounce fish. I posted this article in the members forum to possibly avoid wider general postings on the dead fish.

Lake St. Clair yields two phenomenal fish

<url url="[Permission to view this media is denied]
"><link_text text="[Permission to view this media is denied] … 90662/1058">[Permission to view this media is denied]

08/19/07 BY ERIC SHARP FREE PRESS OUTDOORS COLUMNIST ** you do not have permission to see this link **.

Two remarkable muskellunge have been caught on Lake St. Clair in recent days, one the largest fish ever recorded from that body of water, and the other a tiger muskie that rarely occurs outside of a fish hatchery.

The big fish — 41 pounds, 14 ounces — was caught by Art Kornosky of Grand Rapids, who was fishing with his son, Mark, of Fairhaven, and two friends, Don Taylor of Holly and Mark Van Nuck of Fairhaven.

They caught it trolling a Loke St. Lawrence lure last weekend during a Michigan Ontario Muskie Association tournament.

Competitors filed a protest saying that Mark Kornosky is a charter captain during the week, and though his dad owns the boat, simply having his dad, Art, on the boat doesn't make him an amateur on weekends.

But no matter how the tournament standings shake out, it doesn't change the fact that this is the biggest muskellunge weighed in during MOMA's 51 years of existence

And because MOMA has always demanded that fish be weighed accurately in tournaments, it could be the biggest muskellunge ever to come out of Lake St. Clair, despite rumored bigger fish that were never documented.

Lake St. Clair is the most productive muskellunge water in the world. It's common for trolling anglers to land from 10 to 20 muskellunge a day, numbers that would be a good month on most lakes.

But it has yielded only a handful of documented fish more than 40 pounds, and anglers think that is the result of two factors. First, the enormous abundance of muskies, estimated at 60,000 to 100,000, results in fierce competition for food. And second, Lake St. Clair muskies feed mostly on lean fish like smallmouth bass and perch, whereas lakes that produce record muskies have larger populations of high-calorie prey species like whitefish, suckers and chubs.

Two years ago, several thousand muskellunge were killed in Lake St. Clair by a fish disease, viral hemorrhagic septicemia. Kornosky thinks the VHS mostly killed medium-size fish, 36-46 inches, and that a decreased muskie population has meant more food to go around.

"There's no question muskie numbers were down last year," he said. "A couple of years ago, I'd tell you that if you gave me eight hours, I'd get you 10 fish. I couldn't do that last year. And this year started out slow, but now it has really taken off again, and we're seeing a lot of big ones."

The other unusual fish was a tiger muskie, a cross between the Great Lakes muskellunge that abound in St. Clair and a northern pike.

Forty-one inches long and about 20 pounds, it was caught on a Bucher Top Raider plug by Jerry Kunnath on a busman's holiday when Kunnath didn't have a charter.

"I thought that it was a monster pike right up until we got it to the boat," Kunnath said. "I'd heard of tiger muskies, but I'd never seen one or heard of anyone else catching one here. It was so unusual, I e-mailed the picture to a Department of Natural Resources biologist."

That biologist was Mike Thomas, who works in the DNR's Lake St. Clair research laboratory, and he confirmed it was a tiger muskie and that it was rare.

Great Lakes muskellunge have dark spots on a light background. And while there is a subspecies called the barred muskellunge, it has light, wavy stripes on a green background and is found in inland lakes.

"When I put the picture online, some people came back and said it was a barred muskie, not a tiger," Kunnath said. "So I said that if that was the case, I wanted someone to put on another picture of a fish from Lake St. Clair that looks like that. I'm still waiting.

Kunnath's fish looks like the tiger muskies produced in fish hatcheries, with strong dark barring and spots. The tips of a Great Lakes muskellunge's tail are pointed, and the tips of a northern pike's tail are round. The tips of the tail on Kunnath's fish are in-between, fitting perfectly with the description in ichthyology texts.

Tiger muskellunge are a popular hatchery cross, especially in the South, because they grow quickly compared with the parent species and are useful for controlling panfish populations.

Lake St. Clair has a huge muskellunge population and lots of northerns largely because there is so much room to keep the species separated. But because their mating times have so little overlap, Thomas said, it's rare for the pike-muskie cross to occur naturally, although biologists have found a few sexually ripe male and female pike in the lake in May.

Avatar
1151 Posts
(Offline)
2
August 19, 2007 - 1:22 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

More on the tiger muskie half of the story:
<url url="[Permission to view this media is denied]
"><link_text text="[Permission to view this media is denied] … musky.html">[Permission to view this media is denied]

Avatar
1151 Posts
(Offline)
3
August 23, 2007 - 4:17 am
ToolsPrintQuote

Keeping muskies is no crime

A dozen readers e-mailed or called in with strenuous objections to a story we ran Sunday about a Lake St. Clair record muskellunge that was caught during a fishing tournament and kept for mounting.

All criticized the anglers who caught the 41-pound, 14 -ounce fish, arguing that every muskellunge should be released and muskellunge tournaments should be outlawed. From the tone of the e-mail you'd think the people who kept the muskie had committed a criminal act.

<url url="[Permission to view this media is denied]
"><link_text text="[Permission to view this media is denied] … 30415/1058">[Permission to view this media is denied]

Avatar
477 Posts
(Offline)
4
August 23, 2007 - 7:52 am
ToolsPrintQuote

I think they did!!!!!!!!!!!!

LeMay OUT

Avatar
1151 Posts
(Offline)
5
August 23, 2007 - 9:22 am
ToolsPrintQuote

Note that I placed this controversal topic in the members forum just to keep you informed of what is out there. As a biologist I can understand well both sides of the debate.

Avatar
369 Posts
(Offline)
6
August 23, 2007 - 11:24 am
ToolsPrintQuote

I think the article posted by Reef was well written. However, me personally, I have a hard time coming to grips with the fact that this musky was killed on what amounted to a guide boat. I know it was the tourney winner and gives the guide some good pub but you'd think that a guy who makes his living out there would not want to be associated with catch and kill. I have a problem with arguing that LSC has pleanty of muskies so, therefore, keeping a few does no harm and actually may help out the perch population. While that may very well be true (yes, Will, I don't need the lecture that catch and release probably kills more percentage wise) it tends to justify keeping fish in the casual fisherman's mind. This is like what I experience every year fishing trophy walleye in late fall on Little Bay de Noc… see scores of 8 to 10 lb walleye carcases in the garbage cans at the lake side resort where I stay. The repeated montra I hear from these "meat" fisherman is "there are so many big fish out there that taking a limit for the table is not going to hurt anything." Over looking the fact that big walleyes don't eat nearly as well as the "eaters", do that for enough years and mix in some potential fish kills (can you say VHS) and all of a sudden its a different ball game. Unless I have a new World Record muskie in the bag (when pigs fly and penguins rule Hell) I personally can't see me intentionally killing a ski.

Avatar
863 Posts
(Offline)
7
August 23, 2007 - 12:52 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

Scrappy-

I'm with you on intentionally killing one. However as Hamilton said we have to be careful because people don't understand our reverence for fish, particularly Muskies. This has caused us some grief in the past when loud mouthed idiots start calling "us" elitists and accusing us of blah blah whatever. Right wrong or indifferent once the comments are made they take a life of their own and can seriously hurt our reputation. I no longer tell people not to keep fish, I just go rogerian on their ass and explain the associated risks involved with continual harvest and hope they come to a reasonable conclusion on their own. Win some lose some but keep fighting the war one battle at a time. My solution is to have a 24 hour nascar channel that plays re-runs, that will keep most of the idots at home instead of fishing…

Kevin

Avatar
477 Posts
(Offline)
8
August 23, 2007 - 1:33 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

Scrappy thats a great idea of the NASCAR channel with that I bet the lakes would have alot less people on them. You need to sell that to the ESPN.

LeMay OUT

Avatar
7492 Posts
(Offline)
9
August 23, 2007 - 2:29 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

"Cyberlunge" said:
My solution is to have a 24 hour nascar channel that plays re-runs, that will keep most of the idots at home instead of fishing…

Kevin

As long as you are creating Cyberlunge Cable Network (CCN) can you also add a 24 hour UFC, Pride and WEC channel? I would be on the water a lot less.

Avatar
1937 Posts
(Offline)
10
August 23, 2007 - 2:36 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

O ya! That UFC/WEC is pretty sweet.Them dudes would rip your
arm off then beat ya with it!! 😯

Avatar
863 Posts
(Offline)
11
August 23, 2007 - 2:41 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

Como Es Sta! Beeches Spanish Language Channel Is In the House-

Taquito.

Avatar
369 Posts
(Offline)
12
August 24, 2007 - 2:09 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

Hey, don't get me wrong boys, out in public you are 100% right…if the fish is of legal size who am I to tell folks that they can't keep them. That is their right. However, I think it is wrong if we don't, in the next sentence, tell folks why catch and release makes sense. Who cares if certain folks think we are elitist, we are supposed to be educating folks to our cause which is catch and release. I will be the first to say I will not chastise anyone for keeping a legal fish, that doesn't mean I have to be happy about it or encourage their right to do it.

Avatar
7492 Posts
(Offline)
13
August 24, 2007 - 2:45 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

I'm taking off my President of MMA hat for a minute so I can speak openly…

The thing that REALLY bothers me about this is that fish was killed for cash. Even if it was transported in a livewell and even if they attempted to release it (I heard others that weekend were released but died too) the reason that fish died was it had to be weighed in. It wasn't killed because it was going to be mounted, it's being mounted because it was killed from being mishandled. Sure, fish die from being caught. I've had it happen and if you fish enough you will too. However, the fish that I've lost were from hooking and not from mishandling. I would probably go along with this if the big organization that holds these events actually used them for research. Maybe it's a discussion we need to start with MOMC. We've got the DNR interested in running a mortality study already.

Forum Timezone: America/Detroit
All RSSShow Stats
Top Posters:
Steve S: 2712
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 111
Topics: 9245
Posts: 57511

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 0
Members: 16575
Moderators: 0
Admins: 2

Most Users Ever Online
57
Currently Online
Guest(s)
9