Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Min search length: 3 characters / Max search length: 84 characters
Forum Login
Lost password?
sp_TopicIcon
A few numbers on Austin
Avatar
7492 Posts
(Offline)
21
February 20, 2012 - 5:48 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

"Jim tenHaaf" said:
[quote="Will Schultz"]The only way a spearing ban goes back on Austin is if it becomes a broodstock lake.

And I'm guessing that probably won't happen because it would take them forever and a day to capture fish seeing as how the entire lake is shallow. 🙄

…and too big w/ a disease history.

Avatar
1151 Posts
(Offline)
22
February 20, 2012 - 6:39 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

"Will Schultz" said:
My opinion was that with the spearing present the ONLY way this lake should get fish is if there are extra fish after all other waters have been stocked.

With the GLS being phased in and only four culture ponds available, there will never again be a case of all stocking goals being met. Sorry about that.

Avatar
7492 Posts
(Offline)
23
February 21, 2012 - 9:10 am
ToolsPrintQuote

"Hamilton Reef" said:
[quote="Will Schultz"] My opinion was that with the spearing present the ONLY way this lake should get fish is if there are extra fish after all other waters have been stocked.

With the GLS being phased in and only four culture ponds available, there will never again be a case of all stocking goals being met. Sorry about that.

Don't be so sure about that. The total number requested each year hasn't really changed. Based on the early stage hatchery survivability of the GL strain, with enough eggs, there certainly could be a surplus.

Avatar
681 Posts
(Offline)
24
February 21, 2012 - 11:18 am
ToolsPrintQuote

"Will Schultz" said:
[quote="Hamilton Reef"][quote="Will Schultz"] My opinion was that with the spearing present the ONLY way this lake should get fish is if there are extra fish after all other waters have been stocked.

With the GLS being phased in and only four culture ponds available, there will never again be a case of all stocking goals being met. Sorry about that.

Don't be so sure about that. The total number requested each year hasn't really changed. Based on the early stage hatchery survivability of the GL strain, with enough eggs, there certainly could be a surplus.

I like the sound of that Will!

Avatar
1151 Posts
(Offline)
25
February 21, 2012 - 6:50 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

I like the sound of that Will! Yes, I love Will's optimism. I was just thinking of all the drowned river-mouth lakes and the Saginaw Bay that would need our full production as start-up programs leaving little for inland maintenance.

Avatar
7492 Posts
(Offline)
26
February 21, 2012 - 7:35 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

"Hamilton Reef" said:
I like the sound of that Will! Yes, I love Will's optimism. I was just thinking of all the drowned river-mouth lakes and the Saginaw Bay that would need our full production as start-up programs leaving little for inland maintenance.

Sagimaw Bay will never happen if we're smart. There are no plans for the drowned river mouths any time soon. That leaves what we have requests for now, which doesn't exceed about 35 thousand fish.

Avatar
1033 Posts
(Offline)
27
February 23, 2012 - 11:54 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

They are not hard at all to find on Austin, found some tonight and would be happy to point the DNR in the right direction if they made it a broodstock lake.Lifting the spearing ban was a complete waste of a resource IMO, and yes I know they were extras to begin with. Also, Mr Wesley emailed me saying there was a possibility of stocking in the next year or 2. He cited alot of interest in Austin as the reason. Close to Wolf Lake too.

Forum Timezone: America/Detroit
All RSSShow Stats
Top Posters:
Steve S: 2712
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 111
Topics: 9245
Posts: 57511

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 0
Members: 16575
Moderators: 0
Admins: 2

Most Users Ever Online
368
Currently Online
Guest(s)
32
Currently Browsing this Page

1 Guest(s)