ive been reading about it online for a little while now. Youre talking about the one from Lac Seul right? They put a picture up on muskiefirst and muskyhunter, and AML but some people said that they saw that pic awhile ago and that its not the pic of the 60. Heres the link to muskyhunter
<url url="[Permission to view this media is denied]
"><link_text text="[Permission to view this media is denied] … 11792.html">[Permission to view this media is denied]
Here is a pic of the 60 inch fish???????? You be the judge.
"><url url="[Permission to view this media is denied]<url url="[Permission to view this media is denied]
"><link_text text="[Permission to view this media is denied] … 668sw6.jpg">[Permission to view this media is denied]
” alt=”
"><link_text text="[Permission to view this media is denied] … 668sw6.jpg">[Permission to view this media is denied]
” />
Another pic…
"><url url="[Permission to view this media is denied]<url url="[Permission to view this media is denied]
"><link_text text="[Permission to view this media is denied] … f9fnm2.jpg">[Permission to view this media is denied]
” alt=”
"><link_text text="[Permission to view this media is denied] … f9fnm2.jpg">[Permission to view this media is denied]
” />
Unless that guy is 11 feet tall the aspect ratios just dont work.
Iobviously can't say definitively but Ismell another "legend" brewing.The space between the caudal fin and theanal fin just isnt big enough.
[smilie=applause.gif] [smilie=applause.gif] [smilie=applause.gif]
OK,.. OK,… go ahead and delete it! LOL!!!
Now here is a 60 incher!!!!!!!!!!!!!
<url url="[Permission to view this media is denied]
"><link_text text="[Permission to view this media is denied] … 7rbov6.jpg">[Permission to view this media is denied]
It has-
Built-In HDTV Tuner: Add HD-capable antenna to receive over-the-air high-definition broadcasts, where available. Optional set-top box required for high-definition cable or satellite programming.
60" measured diagonally
1080p display provides the highest quality progressive-scan picture possible from a high-definition source
[smilie=bangtard.gif]
Will-
Unfortunately you are an idiot…anyone can tell by the size of the balloons (which are actual size) that this is at least 60 inches. Balloons back during the time when this was taken were smaller then the modern ones and therefore I have proven the size through mathematicalness which nobody can deny, and if you disagree with me I will write a book about you and open a giftshop selling "Will is a big fat liar" t-shirts.
Kevin
Jeff, your fish must have been at least 61 inches. According to that picture my measureing stick must have been at least 18 inches off. Your fish was surely an inch longer than that one. Hmm Hayward 🙄 dettloff? 🙄 spray 🙄 [smilie=bangtard.gif] [smilie=bangtard.gif] [smilie=bangtard.gif] [smilie=bangtard.gif] My wife says they must use the Man scale what ever that means [smilie=bs.gif] [smilie=bs.gif] Mike and Michelle
57
11