Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Min search length: 3 characters / Max search length: 84 characters
Forum Login
Lost password?
sp_TopicIcon
2016 Lake St. Clair Workshop - 4/14/2016 6:00 PM
Avatar
1269 Posts
(Offline)
1
March 14, 2016 - 9:23 am
ToolsPrintQuote

Mark your calendars! April 14th 6:00 PM – 9:00 PM at Sportsmen's Direct in Harrison Twp. <url url="[Permission to view this media is denied]
">** you do not have permission to see this link **

Five presentations and Q&A with the DNR :

Invasive species of the Huron-Erie Corridor

Ongoing Efforts of Macomb County to Improve Access Lake St. Clair

Effects of Fishing on Bass; Lessons from Michigan and Connecticut

Lake St. Clair Fishery Status Update

Are There Really Too Many Muskies in LSC?

Note that the Darkhouse Association will be in attendance, and has instructed their membership to "behave" 🙂

Avatar
7492 Posts
(Offline)
2
March 14, 2016 - 9:40 am
ToolsPrintQuote

I've kept quiet about this company but I don't want this meeting to seem like it's a fair and open forum. The owner of Sportsmens Direct, John Bacarella, believes there are too many muskies in St Clair and would like to see:
– year round catch and keep
– one fish/day limit
– 34" MSL
– spearing opened January 1 – March 15

He believes these changes will have an immediate positive impact on the local economy through increased sportfishing opportunities and for the muskellunge fishermen themselves. He's armed himself with lots of opinion and feelings in his communications with the DNR and absolutely NO facts. This is going to be another one of those meetings where the DNR presents facts and no one believes what they've presented.

We SHARE one of the most prolific muskellunge fisheries in the world with Ontario, the only thing that will ruin the fishery is if we (humans) get in the way.

Avatar
1269 Posts
(Offline)
3
March 14, 2016 - 1:45 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

Very interesting. All the more reason I will be attending, and curious to see what goes down.

Many of you guys might find <url url="[Permission to view this media is denied]
">** you do not have permission to see this link ** interesting and informative, if you haven't seen it. This data is several years old, I wonder if anything different has been brought to light?

* note that in Adobe you can turn on the 'Presentation Notes' layer, and the little thought bubble-icon in the upper left corner of the slide has more info.

Avatar
7492 Posts
(Offline)
4
March 14, 2016 - 2:21 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

I'll probably send something to Mike before the meeting but it's going to be important to point out exactly what will happen to the population if spearing happened. If roughly 1/3 of all inland lake harvest comes from spearing, we could assume an increase in harvest by 1/3 on LSC. We know what impacts a small increase in harvest can have on a fishery, to increase harvest by 33% on a fishery would be a really bad idea.

Crap… maybe I just need to go to this meeting.

This constant push for spearing really needs to be spread to our friends on the Ontario side of St Clair!!!

Avatar
1656 Posts
(Offline)
5
March 14, 2016 - 3:19 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

To get more exposure to all the muskie guys maybe posting it on some of the more active musky Facebook pages would help. Either of the flee markets on Facebook would get a lot of attention and exposure, but then again you would get some people who may act like idiots if they saw this as well.

Avatar
7492 Posts
(Offline)
6
March 15, 2016 - 12:28 am
ToolsPrintQuote

On a side note… I've been assured by someone very high in the DNR that the NRC will NOT consider anything presented by MDAA. We just need to make sure we keep our voice heard and that we don't ever assume we don't have work to do.

Avatar
1484 Posts
(Offline)
7
March 15, 2016 - 1:27 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

There are some awesome slides in there! Slides 15, 17 and 18 could be used to show exactly what would happen (and why) in the inland waterway, and antrim chains with proper management… Also they show exactly what is happening in Hamlin and will happen in Muskegon, White, etc. if we don't increase the MSL, and or eliminate harvest in key times of the year. [smilie=deadhorse.gif] [smilie=deadhorse.gif] [smilie=deadhorse.gif] [smilie=deadhorse.gif]
Please may the NRC be open minded, and observant to a well thought out presenter [smilie=attention.gif]

Also thanks for pointing out that opened in adobe you get more commentary Duke, I like reading what they have to say about the slides and why they are important, or how they pertain. It's good to have multiple sourced of perspective.

Avatar
1269 Posts
(Offline)
8
March 19, 2016 - 9:40 am
ToolsPrintQuote

I checked in with Mike T of DNR to see if more recent data showed anything different since 2011. In a word, no. Muskies still growing fast AND the population age structure shows good survival up through old age. Perch still growing way below average, with very high recruitment/spawning success – lots of dinks. Walleye spawning still very low in LSC and the Thames R. Erie recruitment has jumped though, so more walleyes expected to move through LSC from there.

Avatar
765 Posts
(Offline)
9
March 21, 2016 - 10:59 am
ToolsPrintQuote

Great info in that slideshow Duke, thanks for sharing.

One thing that stands out to me. Why would a harvest only community, like spearing, be pushing to open harvest on a population of fish with a "Do not eat these fish" warning on them from the Department of Health? Do they just want to stab them for the sake of stabbing them or do they enjoy the taste of mercury? I don't get it…

Avatar
748 Posts
(Offline)
10
March 21, 2016 - 2:21 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

"MattG_braith" said:

One thing that stands out to me. Why would a harvest only community, like spearing, be pushing to open harvest on a population of fish with a "Do not eat these fish" warning on them from the Department of Health? Do they just want to stab them for the sake of stabbing them or do they enjoy the taste of mercury? I don't get it…

I brought this up to the spear guys last year and didn't get the response I was expecting. Noone really seemed concerned and the response for the most part was "we will eat them anyways" or that "the consumption advisory was BS". I was even challenged to find "a single case of someone getting sick from eating Midwest fish" which I did easily but the reaction was just a bunch of scoffing. Anyways I think we all know why they want to spear LSC muskies and it has nothing to do with clean organic protein.

Avatar
1484 Posts
(Offline)
11
March 21, 2016 - 4:19 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

"MattG_braith" said:
Great info in that slideshow Duke, thanks for sharing.

One thing that stands out to me. Why would a harvest only community, like spearing, be pushing to open harvest on a population of fish with a "Do not eat these fish" warning on them from the Department of Health? Do they just want to stab them for the sake of stabbing them or do they enjoy the taste of mercury? I don't get it…

Basically they think the health advisory is yet another conspiracy by the DNR and MMA in an "elitist" method of protecting muskies. The idea stems from walleye eating the same diet, and not being on the do not eat list. They fail to realize that a 6-8 year old walleye is OLD and a 6-8 YO muskie is barely leagal, with the max age being over 20. The long term exposure is a justifiable reason, but is ignored by them because it is inconvenient.

Also, since it is just an advisory I am not sure it really carries any weight in an argument against spearing, as its not illegal… just stupid. But when you're already there…

Avatar
765 Posts
(Offline)
12
March 21, 2016 - 4:42 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

"vano397" said:
as its not illegal… just stupid. But when you're already there…

I won't even bother quoting Tom Hanks here…

Avatar
748 Posts
(Offline)
13
March 21, 2016 - 8:37 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

"vano397" said:
Basically they think the health advisory is yet another conspiracy by the DNR and MMA in an "elitist" method of protecting muskies. The idea stems from walleye eating the same diet, and not being on the do not eat list. …

I didn't realize a 16" wallye ate 18" suckers [smilie=crazy.gif]

Avatar
1484 Posts
(Offline)
14
March 22, 2016 - 11:48 am
ToolsPrintQuote

"Mayhem" said:
[quote="vano397"]Basically they think the health advisory is yet another conspiracy by the DNR and MMA in an "elitist" method of protecting muskies. The idea stems from walleye eating the same diet, and not being on the do not eat list. …

I didn't realize a 16" wallye ate 18" suckers [smilie=crazy.gif]

Fer Sher… They'd have you believe the mercury and PCB levels are in a homeostatic state.

Avatar
7492 Posts
(Offline)
15
June 15, 2016 - 10:12 am
ToolsPrintQuote

Video from the workshop.

<url url="[Permission to view this media is denied]
">[Permission to view this media is denied]

Avatar
210 Posts
(Offline)
16
June 15, 2016 - 8:56 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

Thanks for sharing. Some interesting points made. Never would have thought that the goby population was declining or that the St. Clair river was not fertile. Nice to see the data regarding Muskie diets and that there aren't "too many muskies" in the lake.

Avatar
857 Posts
(Offline)
17
June 15, 2016 - 10:16 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

Thanks for posting. Surprised no questions at the end from the guy front row and center.

Avatar
1484 Posts
(Offline)
18
June 15, 2016 - 11:26 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

"Revinchev" said:
Thanks for posting. Surprised no questions at the end from the guy front row and center.

Soon after the meeting he removed himself from the musky spearing discussion, and has reverted everything back to his boss… I think he realized he is beat and has nowhere to go.

Forum Timezone: America/Detroit
All RSSShow Stats
Top Posters:
Steve S: 2712
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 111
Topics: 9245
Posts: 57511

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 0
Members: 16575
Moderators: 0
Admins: 2

Most Users Ever Online
368
Currently Online
Guest(s)
23