Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Min search length: 3 characters / Max search length: 84 characters
Forum Login
Lost password?
sp_TopicIcon
no pleasure taxes
Avatar
3 Posts
(Offline)
1
January 27, 2007 - 8:51 am
ToolsPrintQuote

it would seem if we r throwing fish back, we might also use natural bait like cedar lures for instance , not plastic, plastic thoughts i get is palmolive bottles and lee press ons. not hunting for vicious scales , hope they never punish the naturalist for using great baits by taxing…just partly kidding

Avatar
249 Posts
(Offline)
2
January 27, 2007 - 12:47 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

I'm sure somebody in Lansing or D.C. has or is devising a way to tax our outdoor pursuits already Cry

Avatar
18 Posts
(Offline)
3
February 5, 2007 - 2:42 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

Understand, if we can get a tax deduction for putting on new doors/windows this past year thus helping save the enviorment. We do other things that are just as significant, but receive no tax deduction.

For instance:

I am sure catch and release in some way or another saves tax dollars. A few years back someone in Minnesota estimated a muskie over a certain size was worth a few hundred dollars. So if you catch one, and release it, you are technically saving the state money in "making" another fish like this. This should be a tax deduction for muskie fisherman.

One also wonders if using no lead lures, sinkers should also be a tax deduction. I am further helping save the enviorment. I know it sounds funny…but so does some of the tax deductions they allow. So I say…why not?

Forum Timezone: America/Detroit
All RSSShow Stats
Top Posters:
Steve S: 2712
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 111
Topics: 9245
Posts: 57511

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 0
Members: 16575
Moderators: 0
Admins: 2

Most Users Ever Online
57
Currently Online
Guest(s)
37
Currently Browsing this Page

1 Guest(s)