Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Min search length: 3 characters / Max search length: 84 characters
Forum Login
Lost password?
sp_TopicIcon
Capture Efficiencies of Two Hook Types and Associated Injury
Avatar
1151 Posts
(Offline)
1
September 13, 2006 - 9:21 pm
ToolsPrintQuote

Volume 26, Issue 3 (August 2006)

North American Journal of Fisheries Management 2006;26:622–627

<url url="[Permission to view this media is denied]
doi=10.1577%2FM05-038.1"><link_text text="[Permission to view this media is denied] … FM05-038.1">[Permission to view this media is denied]
doi=10.1577%2FM05-038.1

Capture Efficiencies of Two Hook Types and Associated Injury and Mortality of Juvenile Muskellunge Angled with Live Baitfish

Kenneth G. Ostrand and Michael J. Siepker

Illinois Natural History Survey, Center for Aquatic Ecology and Conservation, Sam Parr Biological Station, 6401 Meacham Road, Kinmundy, Illinois 62854, USA; and Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, W-503 Turner Hall, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA

Steven J. Cooke

Institute of Environmental Science and Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada

Abstract.—Strict harvest regulations and a strong catch-and-release ethic among recreational anglers of muskellunge Esox masquinongy have led to interest in developing strategies for reducing injury and mortality of released fish. With many anglers using live baitfish to capture muskellunge, the use of circle hooks may reduce deep hooking and hence mortality. We contrasted the performance of circle hooks and J-style aberdeen hooks when capturing juvenile muskellunge with actively fished live baitfish. The J hooks performed better than circle hooks in terms of capture efficiency. The J hooks were more efficient at hooking muskellunge than were circle hooks, but landing efficiency was similar between the two types. Interestingly, injury was judged to be low regardless of hook type. Neither anatomical hooking location nor hooking depth differed significantly between fish captured on J and circle hooks. No fish were hooked in potentially lethal locations (e.g., gullet or eye) during the use of either hook type. Ease of hook removal did not differ between hook types, and hooks were generally categorized as easy to remove. Bleeding was considered minor and did not differ between hooks. We observed no initial or delayed mortality for fish captured on J or circle hooks. Given that J hooks have a higher muskellunge capture efficiency and that the use of circle hooks did not provide any compelling conservation benefits, anglers will probably continue to use J hooks and avoid circle hooks. Nonetheless, use of circle hooks could be advantageous for other fishing styles (e.g., still fishing, where baitfish are often swallowed), other species, or different sizes of muskellunge.

Received: March 15, 2005; Accepted: January 23, 2006;
Published online July 31, 2006

Forum Timezone: America/Detroit
All RSSShow Stats
Top Posters:
Steve S: 2712
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 111
Topics: 9245
Posts: 57511

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 0
Members: 16575
Moderators: 0
Admins: 2

Most Users Ever Online
57
Currently Online
Guest(s)
33