Great Lakes Muskellunge
Moderator: Cyberlunge
I'm going along with Duke's argument here, but what age are the fish going to be when inserted with the PIT tags? I think Duke is saying we are going to waste a ton on PIT tags if we insert them into fish at a young age as only a small percentage of fish make it a decent size.
The Musky Bandit strikes again!
They will be PIT tagged as fall fingerlings - so basically as 8-12"ers. PIT tagging had a history of higher mortality in the past, especially out west with salmoniods. But they've really figured it out pretty well nowadays. Still some room for operator error in handling small fish, but I'd guess that losses will be minimal. If the fish tech really knows what they are doing then fin clipping or freeze banding would be good, but our crew doesn't have much experience with that unfortunately. And because they are so panicked about genetics, PIT tags are the best route to ensure no screw ups. Well, actually I guess that isn't true...a fresh broodstock lake would eliminate screw ups from the get go.jasonvkop wrote:...what age are the fish going to be when inserted with the PIT tags? I think Duke is saying we are going to waste a ton on PIT tags if we insert them into fish at a young age as only a small percentage of fish make it a decent size.
Bass solo take one. "na, neeeeeeeer...n-ne, ner-neer-ner-neer-ner-neer..."
Jason's got it.
No concern with the tagging being the cause of mortality. Although... you know what I bet the handling during the process might do in a few right off the bat, but I doubt enough to matter.
I understand the reasons, but it would still be great to just start fresh with a new lake! But using Thornapple will provide some entertainment (at least for a geek like me) when they begin pulling out some dark green, faintly marked GLS fish. I'm betting some biologists might be saying "I thought these were spotted fish!!???"
No concern with the tagging being the cause of mortality. Although... you know what I bet the handling during the process might do in a few right off the bat, but I doubt enough to matter.
I understand the reasons, but it would still be great to just start fresh with a new lake! But using Thornapple will provide some entertainment (at least for a geek like me) when they begin pulling out some dark green, faintly marked GLS fish. I'm betting some biologists might be saying "I thought these were spotted fish!!???"
Ohhh...I see. Yeah, that is one helluva valid concern. I suppose the temporary PIT tagging of turtles, hungry fish and herons probably isn't the best use of fisheries' bucks!Duke wrote:Jason's got it.
No concern with the tagging being the cause of mortality. Although... you know what I bet the handling during the process might do in a few right off the bat, but I doubt enough to matter.
Bass solo take one. "na, neeeeeeeer...n-ne, ner-neer-ner-neer-ner-neer..."
- Will Schultz
- Posts: 7663
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 11:06 pm
- Location: GR, MI
Yes I would agree, there's no need to throw away a thousand dollars.Pete wrote:Ohhh...I see. Yeah, that is one helluva valid concern. I suppose the temporary PIT tagging of turtles, hungry fish and herons probably isn't the best use of fisheries' bucks!Duke wrote:Jason's got it.
No concern with the tagging being the cause of mortality. Although... you know what I bet the handling during the process might do in a few right off the bat, but I doubt enough to matter.
Self interest is for the past, common interest is for the future.
Dale Hey what is up man!!!
You know we musky fishermen have always have the solution. So if they are married to Thorn for the GLS broodstock, all we have to do is net all the fish out and do a nice and easy adult transplant. Then the GLS can go in without competing with the established NMUS hogs!!!! viola. In fact I'll bet we could even supply all the manpower- DNR just lend the nets and the trucks! Good times
You know we musky fishermen have always have the solution. So if they are married to Thorn for the GLS broodstock, all we have to do is net all the fish out and do a nice and easy adult transplant. Then the GLS can go in without competing with the established NMUS hogs!!!! viola. In fact I'll bet we could even supply all the manpower- DNR just lend the nets and the trucks! Good times
Great point.Jim tenHaaf wrote:Not a really big lake by any means at only 350 acres. We should be sure to note the already unsatisfied people who fish there so in 15 yrs they can't blame it on the muskies. http://www.fishingworks.com/lakes/michi ... bear-lake/
...Note the significant walleye stockings over the last 25 years - ugh.
I suppose an existing spearing-ban trumps all.